Home | Site Map | Contact Regulatory Info Take a Tour Features Subscription Info Resources FAQs Company Events
   
Regulatory News
Regulatory Charts
 

 

Prepared by Copilevitz & Canter, LLC - (816) 472-9000 | This chart is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Consent to Call Monitoring

Jurisdiction

Consent Required

Statutory Citation

Federal
One party 18 U.S.C. § 2511.
Alabama

One party

Ala. Code § 13A-11-30.

Alaska

One party

Alaska Stat. § 42.20.310(a)(1)

Arizona

One party

ARS § 13-30121(9)

Arkansas

One party

Ark. Stat. § 5-60-120(a)

California

Two party consent if communication is confidential1

Cal. Pen. Code § 632(a)

Colorado

One party

CRS 18-9-304(1)

Connecticut

All parties

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d(a).

Delaware

One party

11 Del. C. § 2402(c)(4)

D.C.

One party

D.C. Code § 23-542(b)(3)

Florida

Two party consent with business exemption

Fla. Stat. § 934.03(2)(d)

Georgia

One party

O.C.G.A § 16-11-66(a)

Hawaii

One party

HRS Stat. § 803-42(b)(3)(A)

Idaho

One party

Idaho Code § 18-6702(d).

Illinois

One party

720 ILCS 5/14-3(j)

Indiana

One party

Indiana Code Ann. § 35-33.5-1-5

Iowa

One party

Iowa Code § 808B.2(2)(c)

Kansas

One party

K.S.A. § 21-4001(a)(3)

Kentucky

One party

KY Rev. Stat. § 526.010.

Louisiana

Two party

La. Gen. Ord. R-27021 V.A.6

Maine

One party

15 M.R.S. § 709(4)

Maryland

Two party consent with business exemption

Md. Courts & Jud. Proceedings Code Ann. § 10-402(3)

Massachusetts

Two party consent with business exemption

Mass. Ann. Laws Ch. 272 § 99.

Michigan

All parties

Mich Code 750.539c 2

Minnesota

One party

Minn. Stat. § 626A.02, subdiv. 2(d)

Mississippi

One party

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-531

Missouri

One party

Mo. Stat. § 542.402(2)(3)

Montana

All parties

Mont. Code § 45-8-213(1)(c)

Nebraska

One party

R.R.S. Neb. § 86-290(2)(c)

Nevada

Two party

N.R.S. Ann. § 200.620(1)(a)

New Hampshire

Two party consent with business exemption

New Hampshire Stat. § 570-A:1(IV)

New Jersey

One party

N.J. Stat. § 2A:156A-4(d)

New Mexico

One party

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-12-1(C).

New York

One party

N.Y. CLS CPL § 700.05.

North Carolina

One party

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287(a)(1)

North Dakota

One party

N.D. Cent. Ann. § 12.1-15-02(3)(c)

Ohio

One party

ORC Ann. § 2933.52(B)(4)

Oklahoma

One party

13 Okl. St. § 176.4(5)

Oregon

One party

ORS § 165.540(1)(a)

Pennsylvania

Two party consent with business exemption

18 Pa. C.S. § 5704(15).

Puerto Rico

Two party

33 L.P.R.A. § 2160

Rhode Island

One party

R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21(c)(3)

South Carolina

One party

South Carolina Stat. § 17-30-30(c)

South Dakota

One party

S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20(2)

Tennessee

One party

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601(b)(5)

Texas

One party

Tx. Penal Code § 16.02.

Utah

One party

Utah Code § 77-23a-4(7)(b)

Vermont

No State Law

N/A

Virginia

One party

Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-62(B)(2)

Washington

Two party consent if communication is private.

Rev. Code Wash. Stat. § 9.73.030(1)(a)

West Virginia

One party

W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3(c)

Wisconsin

One party

Wis. Stat. § 968.31(2)(c)

Wyoming

One party

Wyo. Stat. § 7-3-702(b)(iv).


1 "Confidential communication" includes any communication in any circumstance in which the parties may reasonably expect that the communication not be overheard or recorded. Cal. Pen. Code § 632(c). Further, a California court has held that “held that calls made by a caller located outside the state, in this case Georgia, are still subject to California law because the principal purpose of that law is "to protect the privacy of confidential communications of California residents while they are California." Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, 2006 Cal. LEXIS 8362, at *52-53 (Cal. 2006).
2 See Sullivan v. Gray, 117 Mich. App. 476 (1982) for interpretation of statute.

Publish Date: December 21, 2009

 

Privacy Policy | ©2010 possibleNOW, Inc. All rights reserved.