Home | Site Map | Contact Regulatory Info Take a Tour Features Subscription Info Resources FAQs Company Events
   
Regulatory News
Regulatory Charts
 

 

Prepared by Copilevitz & Canter, LLC - (816) 472-9000 | This chart is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Consent to Call Monitoring

Jurisdiction

Consent Required

Statutory Citation

Federal
One party 18 U.S.C. § 2511.
Alabama

One party

Ala. Code § 13A-11-30.

Alaska

One party

Alaska Stat. § 42.20.300 et seq.

Arizona

One party

ARS § 13-3001 et seq.

Arkansas

One party

Ark. Stat. § 5-60-120 et seq.

California

Two party consent if communication is confidential1

Cal. Pen. Code § 632.

Colorado

One party

CRS 18-9-301 et seq.

Connecticut

All parties

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d(a).

Delaware

One party

11 Del. C. § 2402.

D.C.

One party

D.C. Code § 23-541 et seq.

Florida

Two party consent with business exemption

Fla. Stat. § 934.03(d).

Georgia

One party

O.C.G.A § 16-11-60 et seq.

Hawaii

One party

HRS Stat. § 803-41 et seq.

Idaho

One party

Idaho Code § 18-6701 et seq.

Illinois

One party

720 ILCS 5/14-3(j).

Indiana

One party

Indiana Code Ann. § 35-33.5-1-5 et seq.

Iowa

One party

Iowa Code § 808B.1 et seq.

Kansas

One party

K.S.A. § 21-4001.

Kentucky

One party

KY Rev. Stat. § 526.010.

Louisiana

Two party

La. Gen. Ord. R-27021 V.A.6 La.
R.S. 15:1301 et seq.

Maine

One party

15 M.R.S. § 709.

Maryland

Two party with business exemption

Md. Code Ann. § 10-401(4).

Massachusetts

Two party with business exemption

Mass. Ann. Laws Ch. 272 § 99.

Michigan

All parties

Mich. Penal Code 750.539c2

Minnesota

One party

Minn. Stat. § 626A.01 et seq.

Mississippi

One party

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-501 et seq.

Missouri

One party

Mo. Stat. § 542.400 et seq.

Montana

All parties

Mont. Code § 45-8-213

Nebraska

One party

R.R.S. Neb. § 86-701 et seq.

Nevada

Two party

N.R.S. Ann. § 200.620.

New Hampshire

Two party with business exemption

New Hampshire Stat. § 570-A:1(IV).

New Jersey

One party

N.J. Stat. § 2A:156A-2 et seq.

New Mexico

One party

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-12-1 et seq.

New York

One party

N.Y. CLS CPL § 700.05.

North Carolina

One party

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-286 et seq.

North Dakota

One party

N.D. Cent. Ann. § 12.1-15-04.

Ohio

One party

ORC Ann. § 2933.51 et seq.

Oklahoma

One party

13 Okl. St. § 176.2 et seq.

Oregon

One party

ORS § 165.540 et seq.

Pennsylvania

Two party with business exemption

18 Pa. C.S. § 5704(15).

Puerto Rico

No Law

N/A

Rhode Island

One party

R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21(c).

South Carolina

One party

South Carolina Stat. § 16-17-470.

South Dakota

One party

S.D. Codified Laws § 22-21-1 et seq.

Tennessee

One party

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601.

Texas

One party

Tx. Penal Code § 16.02.

Utah

One party

Utah Code § 77-23a-4(7)(b)

Vermont

No State Law

N/A

Virginia

One party

Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-61 et seq.

Washington

Two party with business exemption

Rev. Code Wash. Stat. § 9.73.030.

West Virginia

One party

W. Va. Code § 62-1D-2 et seq.

Wisconsin

One party

Wis. Stat. § 968.27 et seq.

Wyoming

One party

Wyo. Stat. § 7-3-601 et seq.


1 "Confidential communication" includes any communication in any circumstance in which the parties may reasonably expect that the communication not be overheard or recorded. Cal. Pen. Code § 632(c). Further, a California court has held that “held that calls made by a caller located outside the state, in this case Georgia, are still subject to California law because the principal purpose of that law is "to protect the privacy of confidential communications of California residents while they are California." Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, 2006 Cal. LEXIS 8362, at *52-53 (Cal. 2006).
2 See Sullivan v. Gray, 117 Mich. App. 476 (1982) for interpretation of statute.

20070216

 

 

Privacy Policy | ©2008 possibleNOW, Inc. All rights reserved.